do you guys have any comments on why this is getting a 1.5-2?

thanks

I gave it a 5... but hold your horses, that doesn't actually mean I think it's worth a five...

One of the clear misses you have done is the blend. I mean c'mon, you just faded to black, not caring anything about the content on top...

When I see that border, I think things like "a wall" or maybe "an horizontical gray suede jacket" ... now, thinking "I'll just fade to black and do this cool tile I've thinking about" is not cool. You should have waited until a border with black or something earth-like appeared. Or you could have made the border the moon in your tile...

not to hash up the past or anything, but i was just looking over what i've done so far, and i came across this and so i'm wondering why the 0?

" 4th tile "land slide" "
by DEFFREAK i think is up and to the right 2 or 3 tiles from this..

i realize my tile is not incredible and maybe the blend-to-grey thing isn't really good, and i should have tried to do something with the black line in the guy's tile above mine (although i think i must have clipped it out in photoshop by mistake), but i can't see how this tile and his DEFFREAK's tile get the same score...

my tile did take a little time, although i know its not a masterpiece or a great work of art by any means, and i know the logos etc are not hand-drawn, but thats hard to do, and i was just starting and wanted to make something "cool".. so im just wondering why his score for a basically completely unblended tile matches mine, which i tried to blend, and tried to have look cool... oh well..

i've had my ranting and raving for the day now... if you've read this far, congratulations, you do not have ADHD or any of the disorders in the group of ADDs... way to go!

:)

*by the way, i think kde might just kick gnome's ass.. :)